2011研習營 學員訊息通知】

行政事宜相關:

報名相關 Q&A 

本國學員簡章、報名表下載 

簡章 

報名表

Overseas :

Call for applications

Application Form

 

教材相關:

專題講座

課程主題

指定教材

彭小妍

流動的主體性

7/11~7/15

1.           張君勱,〈倭伊鏗精神生活哲學大概〉,《改造》,3.7 (15 March 1921): 1-18

2.           梁啟超,〈東南大學課畢告別辭〉,《飲冰室文集》,5: 7-15

3.           Bakhtin, Mikhail.  “The Heoro, and the Position of the Author with Regard to the Hero, in Dostoevsky’s Art,” in Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), pp. 47-77.

4.           Foucault, Michel.  “What is Enlightenment?” trans. Catherine Porter, in Paul Rabinow, ed., The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984), pp. 32-50.

 

楊小濱

分裂與缺失的主體

7/18~7/22

1.           Žižek, Slavoj.  Tarrying with the Negative (excerpts), pp. 9-18, 39-80.

2.            Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology (excerpts), pp. 153-199.

3.            Žižek, Slavoj. Enjoy Your Symptom! (excerpts), pp. 134-140.

4.            Žižek, Slavoj. "The Interpassive Subject," in How to Read Lacan, pp. 22-39.

5.           Dolar, Mladen.  "Cogito as the Subject of the Unconscious," in Cogito and the Unconscious, pp. 11-40.

6.           Fink, Bruce.  The Lacanian Subject, pp. 35-68.

7.           Yang, Xiaobin. "Ma Yuan, That Chinese Writer," Introduction to Ballad of the Himalayas: Ma Yuan’s Stories of Tibet, trans, Herbert J. Batt (Portland, Me. : MerwinAsia, 2010).

8.           楊小濱:〈欲望「主體」與精神殘渣:對《兄弟》的心理-政治解讀〉,《清華學報》392期(20096月)。頁261-285

9.           楊小濱:〈欲望、換喻與小它物:當代漢語詩的後現代修辭與文化政治〉,《政大中文學報》第14期(201012月)。頁241-266

10.        Žižek, Slavoj. "Does the Subject Have a Cause?," in The Metastases of Enjoyment: Six Essays on Women and Causality (London, New York : Verso, 2005), pp. 29-33.

 

龔卓軍

身體與主體性

7/25~7/29

 課程說明(龔卓軍)

1.         龔卓軍,〈庖丁之手:身體思維與感覺邏輯〉,韓國首爾大學,2008

2.           龔卓軍,〈莊子手藝與生命政治〉,《中研院文哲通訊》184期,頁79-99

3.           龔卓軍,〈肉身共享:侯俊明的色情耗費與賤斥註記〉,《現代美術雙月刊》,20096月,頁38-50

4.           龔卓軍,〈孤獨的四個斷片:關於林良材金屬雕塑創作的系譜思考〉,《歷史文物》,20105月,頁29-35

5.           龔卓軍,〈取樣繪畫.機器物語:談蘇孟鴻個展「彼岸花」〉,《今藝術》,20108月。

6.           龔卓軍,〈從擬作姿態到擬作的力:舞蹈現象學研究〉,《哲學與文化 》,第32卷第12期,頁103-124

7.           龔卓軍,〈姿態影像與影像化的姿態場域:從黃翊到威廉.佛塞〉,《藝術觀點ACT》,46期,2011年春季號,頁48-59 

8.           Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith (London: Routledge, 2005). Part I, Chapt. 3.

9.           Maurice Merleau-Ponty, 'Cézanne's Doubt,' in Sense and Non-Sense trans. by Hubert Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964), pp. 9-24.

10.        Maurice Merleau-Ponty, L'Oeil et L'Esprit, Paris: Gallimard, 1964. "Eye and Mind," trans. Carleton Dallery, in The Primacy of Perception, ed. James Edie (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964), pp. 159-190.   Revised translation by Michael Smith in The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993), pp. 121-149.

11.        龔卓軍中譯,眼與心, 第二節與第四節。台北:典藏出版社,2007

12.        Bergson, Henri. Matter and Memory, trans. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer (London: Allen and Unwin, 1911). Chapt. 1.

13.        Deleuze, Gilles. Bergsonism, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberiam (New York: Zone Books, 1988), pp. 73-90.  Chapt. 4.

14.        Brian Massumi, "Introduction: Concrete Is as Concrete Doesn't," in Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation (Duke University Press, 2002), pp. 1-21.

 

Fabian Heubel

何乏筆

主體性與自然

8/1~8/5

1.           陳鼓應,《莊子今註今譯》。

2.           畢來德,《莊子四講》,北京中華書局(20094月)。

3.           徐復觀,〈中國藝術精神主體之呈現:莊子的再發現〉,《中國藝術精神》,臺灣學生書局(民國522月初版)。

 

講師講座

課程主題

指定教材

Michael Hill

韓嵩文

語言的流變、選擇與主體性

7/13

 課程說明(by Michael Hill)

1. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (New York: Verso, 1991), 2nd edn, pp. 9-46.

2. Ertürk, Nergis. “Phonocentrism and Literary Modernity in Turkey,” boundary 2, 37.2 (2010): 155-185.

3. 裘廷梁,〈論白話為維新之本〉,收入舒蕪等編,《近代文論選》(北京:人民文學出版社,1999年)。

4. 梁啟超,〈沈氏音書序〉,收入《飲冰室文集》(臺北:臺灣中華書局,1968年)。

 

Andrea Bachner

白安卓

己者與異者之間:可翻譯性的問題

7/20

 課程說明(Andrea Bachner)

1. Butler, Judith. “Introduction: Precarious Life, Grievable Life,” in Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? (London and New York: Verso, 2010), pp. 1-32.

2. Butler, Judith. “Violence, Mourning, Politics,” in Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London and New York: Verso, 2004), pp. 19-49. (compulsory reading) 必讀

3. 張小虹。〈緒論:假全球化之名〉,《假全球化》(臺北:聯合文學,2007),頁1534 (compulsory reading) 必讀

 

Larissa Heinrich

韓依薇

生物醫學主體性

7/27

課程說明(by Larissa Heinrich)

1請同學於上課前先看三部電影:

Stephen Frears Dirty Pretty Things (2002)(美麗壞東西)

Pang Brothers The Eye (見鬼, 2002

Fruit Chans Made in Hong Kong (陳果,香港製造,1998.

2、請同學先閱讀Ong, Aihwa. Asian Biotech:  Ethics and Communities of Fate (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010), pp. 1-54.

韓老師提醒同學,由於此篇內容不易讀,所以同學們只要盡力就好。並請同學條列幾點您所了解的本篇重點即可。

同一本書,韓老師挑選了五章:

a. Chen, Nancy. "Feeding the Nation:  Chinese Biotechnology and Genetically Modified Foods," pp. 81-92;

b. Adams, Vincanne, Kathleen Erwin and Phuoc V. Le. "Governing Through Blood:  Biology, Donation, and Exchange in Urban China," pp. 167-189;

c. Ong, Aihwa. "Lifelines:  The Ethics of Blood Banking for Family and Beyond," pp. 190-214;

d. Liu, Jennifer. "Making Taiwanese (Stem Cells):  Identity, Genetics, and Hybridity," pp. 239-262;

e. Sung, Wen-ching. "Chinese DNA:  Genomics and Bionation," pp. 263-292.

請同學任選一章閱讀後,寫一段評論(有自己的意見在其中),屆時於討論時間,與同學分享。

材說明(by Larissa Heinrich)

 

Rivi Handler-Spitz

韓若愚

自傳的主體建構

8/3

 課程說明(Rivi Handler-Spitz)

1. Gusdorf, Georges. “The Conditions and Limits of Autobiography,” in Autobiography: Essays Theoretical and Critical, ed. James Olney (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980), pp. 28-48.

2. Wu, Pei-yi. The Confucian’s Progress: Autobiographical Writings in Traditional China (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), pp. 3-67.

3. Wang, Jing M.,ed. “The Inhibition on Early Chinese Autobiography,” in Jumping Through Hoops: Autobiographical Stories by Modern Chinese Women Writers (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2003), pp. 3-19.


4. Fingarette, Herbert. “The Problem of the Self in the Analects,” in Philosophy East and West, 29.2 (April 1979): 129-140.  (Below, see Roger T. Ames' response to this article among the recommended readings).


Recommended Readings: 延伸閱讀

1. Ames, Roger T. “The Focus Field Self in Classical Confucianism,” in Self as Person in Asian Theory and Practice, Ed. Roger T. Ames and Wimal Dissanayake and Thomas Kasulis (State University of New York Press, 1994), pp. 187-212.

2. Smith, Sidonie and Julia Watson. Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001).  (This book is rather focused on the Western tradition, but may be helpful to glance at as a corrective to Gusdorf).

3. Goody, Jack. “From Collective to Individual? The Historiography of the Family in the West,” in The East in the West (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 162-204. (Chapter 6)

4. Mauss, Marcel. “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; The Notion of Self,” in The Category of the Person, eds. Michael Carrithers, Steven Collins, adn Steven Lukes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 1-25.

5. Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989).

 

      

  

 

 

回上頁